| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
01/04/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
GRAHMANN, K.; RUBIO, V.; PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.; QUINCKE, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
KATHRIN GRAHMANN, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Resource-Efficient Cropping Systems, Research Area . Land Use and Governance, Müncheberg, Germany.; VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay.; JUAN ANDRES QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Soil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system. MenosAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and v... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
INTENSIFICATION INDEX; LONG-TERM EXPERIMENT; RUNOFF; RUSLE; SEDIMENTS; SOIL DEDRADATION; SOIL DEGRADATION. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16656/1/fenvs-10-822967.pdf
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03682naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062950
005 2022-09-05
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967$2DOI
100 1 $aGRAHMANN, K.
245 $aSoil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022.
520 $aAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aINTENSIFICATION INDEX
653 $aLONG-TERM EXPERIMENT
653 $aRUNOFF
653 $aRUSLE
653 $aSEDIMENTS
653 $aSOIL DEDRADATION
653 $aSOIL DEGRADATION
700 1 $aRUBIO, V.
700 1 $aPEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, A.
773 $tFrontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
14/06/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/08/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
RUBIO, V.; GAMA ROLDÁN, D.; PÉREZ BIDEGAIN, M.; QUINCKE, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DIANA GAMA ROLDÁN, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay.; MARIO PÉREZ BIDEGAIN, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay.; JUAN ANDRES QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Evaluación del intervalo hídrico óptimo en un brunosol éutrico típico bajo diferentes intensidades de uso agrícola. (Evaluation of the Least Limiting Water Range for a Typic Argiudoll under Different Intensities of Agricultural Use). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 22(1): p. 107-115, 2018. |
|
ISSN : |
1510 0839 |
|
DOI : |
dx.doi.org/10.31285/agro.22.1.11. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Recibido: 2016-12-13.// Aceptado: 2018-01-30. |
|
Contenido : |
Resumen:
El intervalo hídrico óptimo (IHO) fue propuesto como un indicador de calidad física de suelo que integra en un único parámetro
los efectos de la aireación, la resistencia a la penetración y el contenido de agua del suelo sobre el crecimiento vegetal. El
objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el IHO, conjuntamente con otras propiedades físicas del suelo, bajo diferentes
sistemas de rotación y fertilización. Las determinaciones se desarrollaron en un Brunosol éutrico típico en Colonia, Uruguay,
sobre un experimento de largo plazo de rotaciones agrícola-pastoriles, iniciado en el año 1963. Los tratamientos evaluados
fueron: a) agricultura continua sin fertilización (ACs / Fert); b) agricultura continua fertilizada (AC); c) rotación de cultivos y
pasturas con 50 % del tiempo bajo cultivos (50 % Cult) y d) rotación de cultivos y pasturas con 33 % del tiempo bajo cultivos
(33 % Cult). El IHO disminuyó debido al incremento en la intensidad agrícola, variando entre 0,08 y 0,02 cm3
cm-3 para los tratamientos 33 % Cult y ACs / Fert respectivamente, permitiendo detectar un deterioro en la calidad física de los suelos. El
análisis de los límites que conforman el indicador permite entender las posibles limitantes a las que se enfrentan los cultivos,
mostrando que la aireación y resistencia a la penetración resultan más limitantes a mayor intensidad de uso agrícola del suelo. |
|
Palabras claves : |
COMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO; FISICA DE SUELOS; INDICADOR DE CALIDAD; INDICATOR OF SOIL PHYSICAL QUALITY; INTERVALO HÍDRICO ÓPTIMO; LEAST LIMITING WATER RANGE; PASTURE-CROP ROTATION; ROTACIONES CULTIVO-PASTURA; SOIL COMPACTION. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P33 Química y física del suelo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/10329/1/Agrociencia-Uruguayv.-22-1-p.107-11-rubio.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02570naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1058713
005 2019-08-09
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1510 0839
024 7 $adx.doi.org/10.31285/agro.22.1.11.$2DOI
100 1 $aRUBIO, V.
245 $aEvaluación del intervalo hídrico óptimo en un brunosol éutrico típico bajo diferentes intensidades de uso agrícola. (Evaluation of the Least Limiting Water Range for a Typic Argiudoll under Different Intensities of Agricultural Use).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Recibido: 2016-12-13.// Aceptado: 2018-01-30.
520 $aResumen: El intervalo hídrico óptimo (IHO) fue propuesto como un indicador de calidad física de suelo que integra en un único parámetro los efectos de la aireación, la resistencia a la penetración y el contenido de agua del suelo sobre el crecimiento vegetal. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el IHO, conjuntamente con otras propiedades físicas del suelo, bajo diferentes sistemas de rotación y fertilización. Las determinaciones se desarrollaron en un Brunosol éutrico típico en Colonia, Uruguay, sobre un experimento de largo plazo de rotaciones agrícola-pastoriles, iniciado en el año 1963. Los tratamientos evaluados fueron: a) agricultura continua sin fertilización (ACs / Fert); b) agricultura continua fertilizada (AC); c) rotación de cultivos y pasturas con 50 % del tiempo bajo cultivos (50 % Cult) y d) rotación de cultivos y pasturas con 33 % del tiempo bajo cultivos (33 % Cult). El IHO disminuyó debido al incremento en la intensidad agrícola, variando entre 0,08 y 0,02 cm3 cm-3 para los tratamientos 33 % Cult y ACs / Fert respectivamente, permitiendo detectar un deterioro en la calidad física de los suelos. El análisis de los límites que conforman el indicador permite entender las posibles limitantes a las que se enfrentan los cultivos, mostrando que la aireación y resistencia a la penetración resultan más limitantes a mayor intensidad de uso agrícola del suelo.
653 $aCOMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO
653 $aFISICA DE SUELOS
653 $aINDICADOR DE CALIDAD
653 $aINDICATOR OF SOIL PHYSICAL QUALITY
653 $aINTERVALO HÍDRICO ÓPTIMO
653 $aLEAST LIMITING WATER RANGE
653 $aPASTURE-CROP ROTATION
653 $aROTACIONES CULTIVO-PASTURA
653 $aSOIL COMPACTION
700 1 $aGAMA ROLDÁN, D.
700 1 $aPÉREZ BIDEGAIN, M.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, A.
773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay$gv. 22(1): p. 107-115, 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
